On 4/20/06, Mark Gallagher <m.g.gallagher(a)student.canberra.edu.au> wrote:
G'day Pete,
Kirill Lokshin wrote: "...to an openly
anti-Wikipedia site"
"some amazing people are working behind the scenes and in the front
lines over there [i.e. at Wikipedia], putting in the hours to make a
difference and make Wikipedia better. [...] We wouldn't have this
site if we didn't respect and love the concept of a Wikipedia. It's
the implementation we have issues with."
I believe them when they say they are pro-Wikipedia. I've been
astonished by how many Wikipedians are unwilling to be open to
criticism (one of the essential elements of a cult by the way :) !) I
don't agree with their vehemence of the opposition to WP:OFFICE. But
anyone who's been following this debate about Erik and Danny will
realise its implementation has been completely ham-fisted at times.
So disagree with Wikitruth, and prove it wrong, but don't lie about
it.
I agree with you: this is just Wikipolitics by other means, as opposed
to the straight anti-Wikipedia bizzo peddled by Britannica (through
fear) or Brandt (through sheer kookiness).
Looking through some of the material they're gatherin on various
Wikipedians (FCYTravis and Kelly Martin come to mind), they're
definitely starting to resemble Brandt.
Their stated motivations are quite irrelevant; "legitimate criticism"
need not involve what amounts to borderline defamation (and vicious
stalking) at best.
Kirill Lokshin