On 3/5/07, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 05/03/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG
<guy.chapman(a)spamcop.net> wrote:
Unsurprisingly I back David. That page has an
inglorious history:
started as a wildly out of process straw poll on whether to hang,
disembowel or burn the witch, moved to an RfC, refactored into a form
which was at least marginally compliant, but as David says never
properly certified - and in any case now moot since Essjay has "left
the building". One more piece of navel fluff under the Wikipedia
microscope.
It's hit DRV, where the lynch mob are now asserting that anyone who
doesn't agree with them is too biased to comment:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_March_5#Useā¦
There appear on first glance to be more "This deletion is going to
make us look bad" and "Transparency is important" and "Most of what
got deleted was substantial support for Essjay" than "David's a
(insert bad word)".
--
-george william herbert
george.herbert(a)gmail.com