Arguing that you have not read the contract does not
absolve you of its
terms. With many licences simply availing oneself of their benefits
includes an implicit agreement with the terms of the licence. This can
be the case with shrinkwraped licences where if you break the seal, you
agree to the licence.
I didn't say "not read", I said "not agreed to". I seem to
remember
shrinkwrapped licenses were on shaky legal ground - did that issue
ever get resolved in court?