Yes, I've looked, it's pretty incoherent, and there is
little that I think could be considered grounds for
excluding someone, especially since other remedies
don't seem to have been tried. This case was brought
straight to arbitration without the previous steps
that the guidelines recommend.
Mark
--- John Robinson <john(a)freeq.com> wrote:
What would he
be banned for exactly? Are there
specific edits or problems?
Have a look at
If so it should be possible either to fix it, or
go
through the normal
procedure.
Oh there's a normal procedure, that actually works?
I must have
missed that; what is it?
>What would he be banned for exactly? Are there
>specific edits or problems? If so it should be
>possible either to fix it, or go through the normal
procedure.
>Mark
>
>
>> >3 non-AC member admins to do such a block
>>
>> This is a good idea, we've had five already in
>> Trollkien's case, for example.
>> As with all good ideas, though, it never seems
to
get
implemented (didn't we
first see this proposal months ago?).
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.