Yes, I've looked, it's pretty incoherent, and there is little that I think could be considered grounds for excluding someone, especially since other remedies don't seem to have been tried. This case was brought straight to arbitration without the previous steps that the guidelines recommend. Mark
--- John Robinson john@freeq.com wrote:
What would he be banned for exactly? Are there specific edits or problems?
Have a look at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/JRR_Trollkie...
If so it should be possible either to fix it, or go
through the normal
procedure.
Oh there's a normal procedure, that actually works? I must have missed that; what is it?
What would he be banned for exactly? Are there specific edits or problems? If so it should be possible either to fix it, or go through the normal procedure. Mark
3 non-AC member admins to do such a block
This is a good idea, we've had five already in Trollkien's case, for example. As with all good ideas, though, it never seems
to
get implemented (didn't we first see this proposal months ago?).
Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com/