On 9/12/06, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/12/06, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
To reach 100,000 FAs or GAs - at which point we
could in fact look
Britannica in the eye on quality - will take a parallel process that
isn't turned into stupid amounts of effort for little or no reward.
Wikipedia is not popual due to it's FAs and GAs. It's popular becuase
of it's good enough articles.
Since when was did being "popular" become a goal of the project?
(I used scare quotes around popular because I don't think I've ever
seen data that suggests that we're the most popular resource in any
way other than web traffic. ... and if you think that webtraffic is a
good metric, pause for a moment and consider that MySpace whoops our
ass in that regard.)