On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 12:27:35 -0800, "George Herbert"
<george.herbert(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I am against deleting articles which are accurate but
not (yet) well
referenced. Fixing the references problem is a valid ongoing concern, but I
don't see any reason to delete this article.
Last time, sure. This time, when it's still not fixed? I disagree.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG