On 23/02/2008, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
You appear to have mistaken your personal viewpoint
for a neutral
viewpoint. This is of course an eternal hazard.
Neutrality is very hard here... our normal "talk around the issue"
approach doesn't quite work for a binary "include or don't include"
A lot of the problems with invoking NPOV here are that we're treating
"our" viewpoint (the status quo ante bellum) as by definition neutral,
and I'm not sold on that.
- Andrew Gray