On 23/02/2008, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
You appear to have mistaken your personal viewpoint for a neutral viewpoint. This is of course an eternal hazard.
Neutrality is very hard here... our normal "talk around the issue" approach doesn't quite work for a binary "include or don't include" question.
A lot of the problems with invoking NPOV here are that we're treating "our" viewpoint (the status quo ante bellum) as by definition neutral, and I'm not sold on that.