--- Mark Richards <marich712000(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
I very much hope this does not happen. Setting up
'expert reviews' would be the death of the project.
But the goal of the project is to create the largest free resource of knowledge
that has ever existed. Wiki is a means to that end. So if some aspects of that
process start to result in a drive toward mediocre content, then we *must* make
some changes to put us back on track.
Adding some type of article review system that could scale to cover a large
part of our content would be a massive improvement. Experts should have seats
on those review boards, but so should non-experts. Neither the views of experts
or non-experts would carry more weight - both would be equal (the consensus
view of the board itself is what would count).
-- mav
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free!
http://my.yahoo.com