Well, I'm not an effusive person.
I'm not big on all this "clarity". You are far more confident in the various suppositions about who is who and who did what than I think can be justified, as represented especially in the difference of opinions about what DennyColt was all about. I'm willing to leave things unresolved, and to offer no opinion as (for instance) whether you wrote the contested passage. And far be it from me to demand again another apology for the various things insinuated about me, but I've gotten none yet, nor do I expect that I will.