Well, I'm not an effusive person.
I'm not big on all this "clarity". You are far more confident in the
various suppositions about who is who and who did what than I think
can be justified, as represented especially in the difference of
opinions about what DennyColt was all about. I'm willing to leave
things unresolved, and to offer no opinion as (for instance) whether
you wrote the contested passage. And far be it from me to demand again
another apology for the various things insinuated about me, but I've
gotten none yet, nor do I expect that I will.