Isn't that an easy VFU candidate.
"This article improved significantly during its time on AFD but ended
up deleted based on old votes." Such requests are easily undeleted.
Seems to me that would contradict the current rules of VFU, which are
simply about review of procedural due process.
Try to get such articles undeleted first and see if
VFU is really as
ineffective as you think.
I have. What I got was banned from being allowed to edit VFU or any other
page in the Wikipedia namespace.
BTW, were the improvements mentioned in the AFD discussion so the
closing admin could take it into account?
I'm talking about a hypothetical here, but it's something that happens
quite often. Sometimes the improvements are mentioned, usually they aren't.
--Mgm
Anthony