On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:02 PM, SlimVirgin <slimvirgin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
This is the key point, I think. We don't have an absolute definition
of neutrality. We don't even have a "I know it when I see it" kind of
system. Neutrality -- everywhere -- is a work in progress. Now,
That's exactly right. All this group would be
looking for are good-faith
efforts to edit in accordance with the NPOV policy. It's not an attempt to
control content, but behaviour. Perhaps we should change the title to
reflect that.
You lost me. If you say its all about the content, I'd be on board. You say
its about "behaviour[-alism]," and I go now elsewhere to let you rethink the
idea entirely.
-SV