On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:02 PM, SlimVirgin slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote:
This is the key point, I think. We don't have an absolute definition of neutrality. We don't even have a "I know it when I see it" kind of system. Neutrality -- everywhere -- is a work in progress. Now,
That's exactly right. All this group would be looking for are good-faith efforts to edit in accordance with the NPOV policy. It's not an attempt to control content, but behaviour. Perhaps we should change the title to reflect that.
You lost me. If you say its all about the content, I'd be on board. You say its about "behaviour[-alism]," and I go now elsewhere to let you rethink the idea entirely.
-SV