On 4/5/07, Andrew Gray <shimgray(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I don't see any conceptual difference between us
picking it up from a
paper and republishing it, to the Village Voice picking it up from a
paper and republishing it... does it somehow become more legitimate
three or four transactions down the chain?
My point simply being that the story is already out there from fairly
credible printed sources, including one at least (the Village Voice)
that's fairly well-known and well-read.
It's different when we're the first publisher of any note, but in this
case, we aren't.