On 9/13/05, MacGyverMagic/Mgm <macgyvermagic(a)gmail.com> wrote:
*People continuously criticize VFD/AFD but VFU rarely
ever gets any
requests. To me that says there's barely any stuff that actually needs
to be undeleted.
The standard for undeletion on VFU is so high that a few dedicated
deletionists can block virtually all requests. And the traffic there
is low enough that it's not difficult for those deletionists to do it.
Perhaps some inclusionists should flood VFU with articles and see if it helps.
I also think that there's a case to be made for bold undeletes,
disregarding any so-called consensus that might have arised on
VFD/AFD, when the "consensus" is clearly wrong. In my opinion, an
admin can ignore AFD "consensus" when following it would harm the
encyclopedia.
Kelly