On 9/13/05, MacGyverMagic/Mgm macgyvermagic@gmail.com wrote:
*People continuously criticize VFD/AFD but VFU rarely ever gets any requests. To me that says there's barely any stuff that actually needs to be undeleted.
The standard for undeletion on VFU is so high that a few dedicated deletionists can block virtually all requests. And the traffic there is low enough that it's not difficult for those deletionists to do it.
Perhaps some inclusionists should flood VFU with articles and see if it helps.
I also think that there's a case to be made for bold undeletes, disregarding any so-called consensus that might have arised on VFD/AFD, when the "consensus" is clearly wrong. In my opinion, an admin can ignore AFD "consensus" when following it would harm the encyclopedia.
Kelly