On 19/08/06, Andrew Gray <shimgray(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Incidentally, one of the arguments occasionally
surfacing wrt
notability is "if the Wikipedia article is going to help make this
organisation famous, they're not notable"
Perhaps a corrolary is "if the Wikipedia article can significantly
influence its subject compared to anything else written about them,
should we have it?"
That sounds useful as a rule of thumb, though I wouldn't like to make
it a solid rule. I'm thinking of articles that are more on the
synthesis side than the restated list of facts side. Though no
examples spring to my mind. Hmm ...
- d.