On 19/08/06, Andrew Gray shimgray@gmail.com wrote:
Incidentally, one of the arguments occasionally surfacing wrt notability is "if the Wikipedia article is going to help make this organisation famous, they're not notable" Perhaps a corrolary is "if the Wikipedia article can significantly influence its subject compared to anything else written about them, should we have it?"
That sounds useful as a rule of thumb, though I wouldn't like to make it a solid rule. I'm thinking of articles that are more on the synthesis side than the restated list of facts side. Though no examples spring to my mind. Hmm ...
- d.