Toby Bartels wrote:
>That is why we need a bunch of external team
>certification/sifter projects setting their own
>criteria. Let them deal with these issues and let
us
>get back to business writting a complete,
accurate
and
NPOV
encyclopedia.
Keeping in mind that many of "us"
will want to work on a Sifter/Edupedia project.
... or project'''s'''. That's fine. It's just
another fork. That
project will develop editorial policies of its own,
and will attract its
own supporters. It all seems like a natural
evolution to me. I would
most likely stay here with the Grandpa-Wiki project,
but that's just a
personal preference not much different from the
choice to work on an
other laguage Wiki.
Ec
But we don't want a fork. In a firk, we'd have to
rewrite (or copy) the whole encyclopedia. We don't
want to do that. We want to stay here. We just want to
make it *optional* to filter out objectionable
content.
-LittleDan
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).