--- Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
Toby Bartels wrote:
That is why we need a bunch of external team certification/sifter projects setting their own criteria. Let them deal with these issues and let
us
get back to business writting a complete, accurate
and
NPOV encyclopedia.
Keeping in mind that many of "us" will want to work on a Sifter/Edupedia project.
... or project'''s'''. That's fine. It's just another fork. That project will develop editorial policies of its own, and will attract its own supporters. It all seems like a natural evolution to me. I would most likely stay here with the Grandpa-Wiki project, but that's just a personal preference not much different from the choice to work on an other laguage Wiki.
Ec
But we don't want a fork. In a firk, we'd have to rewrite (or copy) the whole encyclopedia. We don't want to do that. We want to stay here. We just want to make it *optional* to filter out objectionable content. -LittleDan
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com