On 6/5/07, Tony Sidaway <tonysidaway(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/5/07, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I thought there was an established review process for featured
articles - on what authority did you just remove it from the list? If
there was a BLP violation, then remove it from the article, certainly,
but there is no need to unilaterally remove its featured status when
there is a perfectly good process for doing that.
I'm sorry, that just doesn't make sense. Featured articles are
supposed to be our *best* articles. not steaming piles of excrement.
I don't know about one of the best, but I found the article to be
interesting and half-decent (though a little bit rambling), up until the
"Social Impacts" section (which I skipped as it sounds like a boring topic).
Why do you think the article was a steaming pile of excrement? Had you ever
seen the video before reading it? I've never seen it, nor did I read the
transcript.