Ryan Delaney <ryan.delaney(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I think that's a noble goal, and the idea behind
this project seems like a
good one. Incidentally, I'm probably in the running for most rabid
inclusionist here.
Correcting systematic wrongs is, I agree, good.
I think we all ought to be able to understand,
though,
that it goes too far when the experiment itself becomes a source of
disruption. I don't know all the details, but I'm guessing that's why WSC
asked to put it on hold.
Eh. Remember when Jimbo nullified the WP:ATT merger? Or when
Foundation handed over a 1/4 Million USD to some marketeering outfit?
The point is that "disruptions" happen. We celebrate the good ones.
-Stevertigo
"见风转舵