On 5/28/06, Steve Bennett <stevagewp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/28/06, Tony Sidaway <f.crdfa(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
If instead you have a shadow admin account for
each admin user, we're
back where we started, but with the disadvantage that we can't see
anything about an admin except his admin actions. I cannot see what
Are non-admin actions necessarily relevant? Is the fact that an admin
spends all his time editing Pokemon articles relevant when he blocks
someone for racist propaganda? These aren't rhetorical questions.
Well it is relevant if he blocks someone who is editing a pokemon
article that he is also editing. And if you don't know what he edits,
there is also the question of his motivation. Far better that editors
can plainly see that the administrator who blocked them was not
involved in a content dispute on the article.