BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
picture I am
about to allow through is work safe? Well I can hope it
is mention in the caption but if we take say this version of the
article it clearly isn't:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Titanic_%281997_movie%29&oldi…
Is this a purely theoretical discussion? Naming that page as an
example of a page that isn't "work safe" is laughable. Surely, in most
work-places it isn't work safe to waste your salaried time reading up
about Titanic, but THAT PARTICULAR IMAGE does not make the page less
"work safe" than it already is.
The long-forgotten genesis of this thread was that Sean Barrett
was observing that WP's current stance on images meant that a
WP user could run afoul of companies' anti-sexual-harassment
policies (images of nudes being considered to create a "hostile
work environment"); some of those policies require that
employees be terminated for violating them. So it's not at all
theoretical; I would advise any person who works for such a
company not to use WP for any purpose at all during work hours,
even if the intended use of WP is work-related.
Stan