On 14/03/07, Rich Holton <richholton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2. I thought part of the aftermath of the whole
Erik/Danny thing was to
make insist that Danny make it clear when he is performing an Office
action versus just editing like anyone else. Am I misinformed?
Yep.
I am truly puzzled that there is no further reaction
to the issue that I
brought up with my earlier post. Have we really come to the point where
where have a de-facto class of editors who are un-revertable, where
reverting them is seen to be an offense, regardless of the merits of the
case?
I suspect it's overlearning from those with a compulsion to Taylorise
all possible judgement away.
- d.