LouI wrote:
Toby Bartels wrote:
>LittleDan wrote:
>>That creates a paradox. Any one scheme for
censorship (or even flagging) is
>>POV, while a lack of one is also POV. We're stuck. So let's choose the
choice
>>which will broaden our audience the most: flagging built into the software.
>Failing to categorify content is POV???
>Where's the bias?
I accept Dan's point. The idea that all types of
material MUST be available
without filtering (py parents for example) is a POV about how children should
be educated.
It would be ... if Wikipedia were in the business of educating children.
This is a very slippery kind of concept, sort of like
the
difference between 'freedom OF religion' and 'freedom FROM religion'.
I don't understand the analogy;
it might help if I knew your opinion on freedom from religion,
since as it is I can't even tell which way you go on that!
-- Toby