LouI wrote:
Toby Bartels wrote:
LittleDan wrote:
That creates a paradox. Any one scheme for censorship (or even flagging) is POV, while a lack of one is also POV. We're stuck. So let's choose the choice which will broaden our audience the most: flagging built into the software.
Failing to categorify content is POV??? Where's the bias?
I accept Dan's point. The idea that all types of material MUST be available without filtering (py parents for example) is a POV about how children should be educated.
It would be ... if Wikipedia were in the business of educating children.
This is a very slippery kind of concept, sort of like the difference between 'freedom OF religion' and 'freedom FROM religion'.
I don't understand the analogy; it might help if I knew your opinion on freedom from religion, since as it is I can't even tell which way you go on that!
-- Toby