Ray Saintonge wrote:
Charles Matthews wrote:
Anyway, I commend the triangle: currency, comprehensiveness, quality.
Most people around the wiki can probably plot themselves somewhere in
the interior, and this gives a kind of map of pr[i]orities.
I wouldn't see it as a triangle, but as a bi-polarity with currency
being a variation of comprehensiveness in the time dimension.
The fact that Lih
made an issue on the timeliness of the inclusion of
[[Pownce]] start-up, whose mayfly life was within 2008, while my current
interests are (as you know) getting DNB-level detail on the 17th century
into enWP suggests to me that these priorities are worth distinguishing.
Charles