Ray Saintonge wrote:
Charles Matthews wrote:
Anyway, I commend the triangle: currency, comprehensiveness, quality. Most people around the wiki can probably plot themselves somewhere in the interior, and this gives a kind of map of pr[i]orities.
I wouldn't see it as a triangle, but as a bi-polarity with currency being a variation of comprehensiveness in the time dimension.
The fact that Lih made an issue on the timeliness of the inclusion of [[Pownce]] start-up, whose mayfly life was within 2008, while my current interests are (as you know) getting DNB-level detail on the 17th century into enWP suggests to me that these priorities are worth distinguishing.
Charles