On 2/22/06, Steve Bennett <stevage(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/22/06, Guy Chapman aka JzG <guy.chapman(a)spamcop.net> wrote:
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 21:41:03 -0500, you wrote:
Which does more harm, having and fighting over an article which has
been accused by some in good faith of actively contributing to the
mimetic process, or stepping back and having nothing to do with it?
If "stepping back" means banishing the topic from Wikipedia, then I
would consider such a precedent potentially very harmful.
I agree, especially because the article didn't show the image, nor did it
provide much in the way of information about Brian *the person* (only Brian
the meme). That said, this is Jimbo's project. If he says the article is
banned for a year, it's banned for a year. We my grumble about it (heck, we
already *are*), but ultimately, what Jimbo says, goes.