On 02/04/2008, Ian Woollard <ian.woollard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 01/04/2008, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Seems to
me this is pretty similar; you appear to be worried that
somebody, somewhere doing something that is not routinely done on the
wikipedia could possibly break the law.
You know what? Yeah, they could. And how is this the wikipedia's
problem?
Because it is a problem caused by the material being non free.
Hah! Is it a problem with a GFDL'd image that if you hand painted a
meatball in it that it becomes illegal? Gasp! GFDL clearly isn't free!
OMG you can't make all derived works!!!! Delete all the GFDL'd images
from the wikipedia immediately!!!
Pure GFDL is non free we know this. But that is an aside. That you
cannot combine non free with free material is a feature not a bug.
No, in general it's a problem due to living a
society with laws that
apply to images. Some of these laws put restrictions on what images
you can *make* in any way, as a derived work or *otherwise*. None of
the NASA images stop you making derivatives *from* then. They are free
images in any *sensible* definition.
Not really. By the standards you've just used crown copyright images are free.
And yes, there are images you can't make from
NASA images. But they
are images you can't make *anyway*.
No there are images I can't make from images with the NASA logo (okey
technically I'm not sure how the extradition hearing would work out).
Remove the logo and I can make them.
--
geni