Inevitable Postulate of
Version Control]
"WereSpielChequers" <werespielchequers(a)googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:8b07072f0907230421w257405c9w9d411ec737e7ca16@mail.gmail.com...
Actually there are circumstances when admins can and
should edit fully
protected articles per:
WP:FULL.<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:FULL>
Does anyone really object to the idea of admins responding to a request
for
admin help by editing a fully protected page in accordance with talkpage
consensus?
WereSpielChequers
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 05:47:18 -0400
From: wjhonson(a)aol.com
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] How wikipedia could link into File Protection.
To: wikien-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Message-ID: <8CBD991B3A1AD8C-1414-581B(a)webmail-mh03.sysops.aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
When full protection is used, then it should stay until it is changed to
semi-protection.
We should not have a type of protection that allows admins to make
*content* changes willy-nilly.
When an article is in full protection, admins should not be making
content
changes, except perhaps to revert changes that were the problematic ones
in
the first place.
<<Jay's original email refers to using this when there has been an edit
war - in other words when full protection *is* used currently.>>
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l