So far as I can tell from percentage breakdowns by country in Alexa,
the Chinese go to hudong and
zh.wikipedia.org equally often- virtually
the same number of page hits. However, hudong ranks 112 and
wikipedia.org ranks 66 in China, which tells you that a lot of people
are reading the other languages more than Chinese.
On 21/04/2009, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2009/4/21 Scientia Potentia est
<bibliomaniac_15(a)yahoo.com>om>:
I'm not too concerned. Their notability
standards seem to be very loose,
and they have >few of the trappings that we emphasize: BLP, neutrality,
reliable sourcing, brilliant prose, >etc. The software is also much more
focused on social networking. Furthermore, Hudong >is not free.
Apart from the neutrality our readers and most of our writers tend not
to care about that. The integration with a degree of social networking
tools is also interesting They have a forum linked off their main page
among other things.
--
geni
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
-Ian Woollard
We live in an imperfectly imperfect world. Life in a perfectly
imperfect world would be *much* better. Life in an imperfectly perfect
world would be pretty ghastly though.