geni wrote:
That's
enough, both of you. Sollog is winning. I'm not calling either of
you Sollog; but this is *exactly* the kind of thing that the detractors
of the Wikipedia want - for the project to fall apart through petty
flame wars. We'll already lost enough valuable contributors - we don't
need you to go as well. Now take a deep breath, and forget about this
whole thing. It's not worth it. The topic of content suitability has
been raised before, will be raised again, and I suggest that we all
ignore it until a suitable proposal from the Wikimedia foundation is put
forth.
Forget about it? Are you seriously suggesting that the [[NSFW]]
article is accepterable? It is barely even a stub.
I meant the argument about people knowing how to use their browsers -
possibly the argument about the image as well - but articles always need
improving, and that is the point of Wikipedia, *not* flame wars about
who's pictures are showing what. Since [[NSFW]] is a stub, I invite
everyone to improve it - heck, nominate it as COTW even.
--
Alphax
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alphax
There are two kinds of people: those who say to God, 'Thy will be done,' and those
to whom God says, 'All right, then, have it your way.' - C. S. Lewis