On 13/03/07, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
This is something people have complained of over the
past few years -
that we look too good for readers who aren't thinking.
(...)
You're quite correct. There was one minor press
kerfuffle a few weeks
ago where some wag had sent several UK newspapers a link to a history
version of [[Cheryl Cole]] saying her husband was gay. It took a
moment on the first call to work out that was actually a history link
and they were the victims of a prankster.
I wonder sometimes if we ought to mark non-live and non-article pages
somehow visually, to flag up that they're not quite right. I'm not
sure how - a red bar at the top under the pagename?
This is an archived draft of the article {{PAGENAME}}. It may contain
inaccuracies or errors not present in the [[{{PAGENAME}}|current
version]].
{{PAGENAME}} is in the [[Wikipedia:User pages|personal workspace]] of
a [[Wikipedia:Editors|Wikipedia user]]. It is not an encyclopedia
article.
(You'd be *amazed* what people find through google... and what people
leave lying dormant in userspace...)
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk