On 22/06/06, Mark Wagner <carnildo(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/21/06, Fred Bauder <fredbaud(a)ctelco.net>
wrote:
The problem is that what we are removing is stuff
like personal
information or libelous statements that we really do want to vanish
and not be repeated internally.
Then the log as viewable to the world at large should say something
like '10:49, 22 June 2006 Fred Bauder deleted 1 revision(s) of "George
W. Bush" (Personal information)'
An idle thought vaguely prompted by this... you know what would be
nice? After a normal deletion, for the history to go from
* 12:13 2006-01-01 User:Adam m. (Fixed typo)
* 12.54 2006-01-01 User:Bill (Expanded biographical section)
* 13.17 2006-01-01 User:Vandal (...)
* 13:22 2006-01-01 User:NotAdmin (Remove defamation)
to
* 12:13 2006-01-01 User:Adam m. (Fixed typo)
* 12.54 2006-01-01 User:Bill (Expanded biographical section)
* 13.17 2006-01-01 User:Admin [Revision deleted (Defamatory material)]
* 13:22 2006-01-01 User:NotAdmin (Remove defamation)
rather than
* There is one deleted revision.
* 12:13 2006-01-01 User:Adam m. (Fixed typo)
* 12.54 2006-01-01 User:Bill (Expanded biographical section)
* 13:22 2006-01-01 User:NotAdmin (Remove defamation)
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk