On 8/24/07, michael west <michawest(a)gmail.com> wrote:
What I meant was before any editor is directed to the actual GFDL license,
they are treated with our "editorial philosophy" - write it and weep! It
isn't GFDL in a nutshell and earlier David said that GFDL can never be in
a
nutshell. Either ditch the write it and weep (you may be edited
MERCILICILLY) or pop up the whole GFDL before every post and agree, like
you
ndo with every piece of software. or ditch it and license everything to
the
foundation, with a clause saying that "it" will not be indemnified
etc...........
Huh? Why would we want to harass our editors by popping up the licence
before each edit is made?
Johnleemk