On 8/24/07, michael west michawest@gmail.com wrote:
What I meant was before any editor is directed to the actual GFDL license, they are treated with our "editorial philosophy" - write it and weep! It isn't GFDL in a nutshell and earlier David said that GFDL can never be in a nutshell. Either ditch the write it and weep (you may be edited MERCILICILLY) or pop up the whole GFDL before every post and agree, like you ndo with every piece of software. or ditch it and license everything to the foundation, with a clause saying that "it" will not be indemnified etc...........
Huh? Why would we want to harass our editors by popping up the licence before each edit is made?
Johnleemk