Cheney Shill wrote:
Interesting, but policy is policy, not your
opinion or
consensus, both of which you have no NPOV reliable
sources
for. Besides this discussion is with regard to
articles
that are completely uncited. In other words, you're
providing a false dilemma. It's not about citing every
last fact or deleting the article. It's about getting
substantial ("significant") reliable sources cited, as
is
clearly and repeatedly stated in policy and
guidelines.
Oh please! Consensus guides policy, not the other way
around which
would be wikilawyering.
And how do we determine what the present consensus is? You
gave no citations to reliable sources. Are you arguing
that the stated policy is not consensus? If so, where is
this consensus and why isn't it in policy? Could you point
us to where it says consensus is absolute and
non-negotiable?
~~Pro-Lick
(now a Wikia supported site)
--spam may follow--
____________________________________________________________________________________
Don't get soaked. Take a quick peak at the forecast
with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut.