--- Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
Cheney Shill wrote:
Interesting, but policy is policy, not your opinion or consensus, both of which you have no NPOV reliable
sources
for. Besides this discussion is with regard to articles that are completely uncited. In other words, you're providing a false dilemma. It's not about citing every last fact or deleting the article. It's about getting substantial ("significant") reliable sources cited, as
is
clearly and repeatedly stated in policy and guidelines.
Oh please! Consensus guides policy, not the other way around which would be wikilawyering.
And how do we determine what the present consensus is? You gave no citations to reliable sources. Are you arguing that the stated policy is not consensus? If so, where is this consensus and why isn't it in policy? Could you point us to where it says consensus is absolute and non-negotiable?
~~Pro-Lick http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/User:Halliburton_Shill http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pro-Lick http://www.wikiality.com/User:Pro-Lick (now a Wikia supported site)
--spam may follow--
____________________________________________________________________________________ Don't get soaked. Take a quick peak at the forecast with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather