On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 4:51 AM, Seth Finkelstein <sethf(a)sethf.com> wrote:
What's so interesting in specific here, is that
only now has Larry Sanger's
evidence reached
some of the relatively tiny number of core editors who
are highly
influential in shaping the relevant Wikipedia articles.
The article where this is covered, [[History of Wikipedia]] had a neutral
balanced and stable assessment of the Sanger/Wales dispute and
"founder/co-founder" issue, for years now.It had nothing to do with "Larry
Sanger's evidence" reaching a "tiny number of core editors", and
everything
to do with mass participation. It was well described as far back as 2007 and
(unless vandalized) is so today.
FT2