On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 4:51 AM, Seth Finkelstein sethf@sethf.com wrote:
What's so interesting in specific here, is that only now has Larry Sanger's
evidence reached
some of the relatively tiny number of core editors who are highly influential in shaping the relevant Wikipedia articles.
The article where this is covered, [[History of Wikipedia]] had a neutral balanced and stable assessment of the Sanger/Wales dispute and "founder/co-founder" issue, for years now.It had nothing to do with "Larry Sanger's evidence" reaching a "tiny number of core editors", and everything to do with mass participation. It was well described as far back as 2007 and (unless vandalized) is so today.
FT2