Guettarda wrote:
On 1/25/07, Andrew Gray <shimgray(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> On 25/01/07, George Herbert <george.herbert(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > There are large swaths of technical topics which are not computer-geek
> > technical stuff which are covered extremely poorly, if at all.
> >
> > Engineering materials, for example - aluminum, steel, composite
> > materials, others. I went through and it seemed like doubled the
> > structural and aerospace materials article count 2-3 months ago, and I
> > haven't even gotten started properly...
> >
> > Structural design concepts that anyone in an industry knows from
> > school and are common professional knowledge, and still have no WP
> > coverage.
> >
> > This is just off the top of my head. I've got a to-do list somewhere
> else.
>
> Mmm. Could you put it on-wiki? The enormous redlink farms are
> occasionally a decent incentive to do something, and if nothing else
> they help give an idea of what's still out there.
I just added about 20 to my userpage this morning.
Jeff
--
If you can read this, I'm not at home.