On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Fred
Bauder<fredbaud(a)fairpoint.net>
wrote:
2009/9/9
Fred Bauder <fredbaud(a)fairpoint.net>et>:
Would you have us do different?
I would prefer something more honest, rather than defaming innocent
editors trying to add true and verifiable information to articles. I
would suggest just protecting the article straight away with a link to
the OTRS ticket. Such a protection isn't any less subtle that the
current practice, I would argue it is more so.
We need to do something that is both effective and does not attract
attention. Like maybe deleting and protecting the article and
redirecting
it to the New York Times. And caste it as speedy delete for non-notable
subject.
Well, posting a plan like that to a publicly archived mailing list is
a good start at not attracting attention.
Carcharoth
Actually, no, that is a throw-away. But we do need to get a little
smarter. We might have something come up that is a bit more serious.
Fred