That there is a small group of people who are intent
on deleting certain classes of factual, verifiable
articles.
What Anthony seems to be saying, in response to your
comment that no one cares about the schools articles,
is that hardly anyone cares about most of the
articles. Outside of a core of articles that many
people read, there are many that few people read.
The fact that they are of interest to a few, rather
than many, is not reason to delete them.
Mark
--- Rick <giantsrick13(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Are you really trying to claim that there is some
cabal out there plotting to delete 90% of the
content of Wikipedia? If not, what ARE you trying
to say?
RickK
Anthony DiPierro <anthonydipierro(a)hotmail.com>
wrote:
So you don't see how we'd lose from deleting 90% of
the articles we have? I
guess we'd still be better than the other freely
distributed online
encyclopedias; we'd be free as in freedom and have
more in depth coverage,
but I seriously doubt we'd be able to crush them out
of existence within 5
years.
Anthony
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile
phone.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail