That there is a small group of people who are intent on deleting certain classes of factual, verifiable articles.
What Anthony seems to be saying, in response to your comment that no one cares about the schools articles, is that hardly anyone cares about most of the articles. Outside of a core of articles that many people read, there are many that few people read.
The fact that they are of interest to a few, rather than many, is not reason to delete them.
Mark
--- Rick giantsrick13@yahoo.com wrote:
Are you really trying to claim that there is some cabal out there plotting to delete 90% of the content of Wikipedia? If not, what ARE you trying to say?
RickK
Anthony DiPierro anthonydipierro@hotmail.com wrote: So you don't see how we'd lose from deleting 90% of the articles we have? I guess we'd still be better than the other freely distributed online encyclopedias; we'd be free as in freedom and have more in depth coverage, but I seriously doubt we'd be able to crush them out of existence within 5 years.
Anthony
Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail