Sure, but that's not what the phrase is actually
used to mean.
What does it mean then?
Emily
On Aug 27, 2009, at 9:08 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> 2009/8/28 Emily Monroe <bluecaliocean(a)me.com>om>:
>>> A true consensus requires everyone to agree (or, at least, not
>>> object).
>>
>> You're right.
>>
>>> That is why things like RFA work on "rough consensus", which
>>> actually just means a vote.
>>
>> See, my vision of "rough consensus" is something like "If you
>> eliminate people who !vote without leaving any comment to debate
>> upon,
>> and who hasn't participate in the debate elsewhere, or who do
>> something like WP:WHYNOT, WP:NOTNOW, or WP:I[DON'T]LIKEIT what do you
>> get?" I guess this would be a vote in a sense, albeit a very skewed
>> one.
>
Sure, but that's not what the phrase is actually
used to mean.
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l