Pilotguy wrote:
Obviously looks to me like it was deleted because it wasn't written to our
standards. I just took a quick glance at the deletion log, but it looks like
this article might be worthy of inclusion, that is, if we can find the right
person to write it. Just my two c's...
Looks more like a case of "things made up in school one day" and "no
reliable third-party sources" to me.
Mind you, I have nothing against parody religions. But like any other
meme, they do need to establish at least some bare minimum of notability
before being included in an encyclopedia. Merely setting up a website
on a free webhost and spamming some wikis and discussion boards doesn't
suffice.
According to an "official" list (set up by the founder of the religion)
on PetitionOnline, this one has a grand total of 37 self-described
followers so far:
http://www.webcitation.org/5MJKL4UYk
http://www.webcitation.org/5MJJvuscx
Also compare:
http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?word1=pieism&word2=pastafarianism
http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?word1=pieism&word2=discordianism
--
Ilmari Karonen